Wednesday, May 7, 2008

Conditioning Work

If you want to do need to turn traditional periodisation upside down.

As with other posts...I'll try to make this short and sweet and then we can fight over it afterwards.

With conditioning work...getting is generally approached like this:

Base in developing a 'good endurance' base. Then some sort of Speed Endurance build up speed repeatability. Then to bring these athletes to a razor sharp peak you do your Speed and Acceleration work. That's the usual pattern...simplified I know but it goes along those lines.

I think it is just plain stupid and I do it this way instead. Do the Speed and Acceleration work first....actually get them fast to begin with. Then do some speed endurance/repeatability work...because now they actually HAVE some speed and acceleration to endure. Then lastly work on expanding work capacity so they can express their speed and acceleration more often and with less recovery.

You could take ANY field a time and motion analysis for ANY position and ANY player and find out the total distance covered in a game and I bet if you measured it out and gave me the same length of time I could cover the distance without hardly getting out of isn't your 'fitness' that is lacking in field isn't your 'VO2 max' that stops you from is your lack or speed/acceleration/power/agility that is lacking and more particularly your ability to express these qualities often and in quick succession.

So to answer the question re getting someone 'fit' for intervals you will see the same patterns in all my conditioning programs...they start off with short intervals and long recoveries and the intervals slowly get longer as the ability to sustain intensity is developed and or recoveries get shorter as the ability to sustain and repeat intensity is developed.

Does that make sense? There is no point doing speed endurance or speed repeatability work if the speed you are enduring or repeating is SLOW!


Shaf said...

Ian King and I had a fairly comprehensive discussion about this very same topic back in 1998 or 1999.

"Reverse Periodization" or whatever.

It's good to be reminded of it.

Will Heffernan said...

Great minds think alike...I hope I don't lose mind like he did.

Shaf said...

I may have been some sort of association with me. In that case, you're fucked since I've actually met you.

Will Heffernan said...

I think that is probably true of everyone you've me Shaf.